Simyaci

Members
  • Content Count

    1,061
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Simyaci

  1. +1 because of the stamina usage
  2. Suggestion part 1 Make corpses of Hell Scorpions and Lava Fiends mineable giving common ores or stones with high chance, rare ores or stones with low chance, very rare ores or stones(?) with very low chance randomly. Suggestion part 2 Add Golems into the game that are of different type and each drop a different ore or stone when their corpse is mined. They should be passive creatures. The more rare/valuable the ore or stone their corpse can be mined for, the stronger they are. So a Marble Golem would be much stronger than a Stone Golem. A Golden Golem would be much stronger than an Iron Golem. The rarity of spawn of these golems wouldn't differ much. A Moonmetal Golem would spawn very rarely and be extremely powerful, requiring a small group or a very powerful character to kill it. Its loot wouldn't be significant enough to gather even a small event or a small group of able characters. The corpse of the golem while intact could be used to create a statue of the golem. The statue's type and looks would be based on the golem's type. The chance to create these statues would be very low and it would require a high stonecutting skill to create them while still having very low chance with high stonecutting skill and tool. The metal golem statues would require jewelsmithing instead of stonecutting. All of these golems would have high resistance against all weapons while having weakness against mauling weapons. Metal golems would be weak against corroding atacks and Stone golems would be weak against water attacks. Wooden golems could also be added, being weak against fire attacks and axes. All of the Golems would have low offensive capability while extremely durable.
  3. Get rid of the curve, turn epic into teleportable from freedom PvP server (cluster) like Defiance (no item transfer portal) but accessable from both SFI and NFI. This could happen before the SFI NFI merge since you should be able to only teleport back to your home cluster when teleporting from epic as an outsider. That and registering original epic players as having SFI as their home cluster while changing their skills with the formula alongside the removal of the curve. Defiance is only 1 PvP server accessible from NFI and Epic could be a teleportable PvP cluster accessible from anywhere with relatively safer home servers.
  4. Because there aren't any massive golden dragons with laser cannons that destroy deeds randomly creating marble veins out of them while carrying passengers going around the server?
  5. The already existing random affinity and gift packs are 100 times more gambly than what I am suggesting. This is like a drop of water on the full bucket. Random Affinity gives you a chance to get the affinity you want which is %50 skillgain at max (which is no joke). It involves lots of gambling getting trash affinities while trying to get the ones you need. Gift pack has very low chance (below 1%) items that are super rare and special while it gives you you trash most of the time, especially compared to its value. You buy a weapon skin box and it gives you a weapon you don't want, you can easily sell it and buy the one you want from someone else who opened a box as well and got an item he didn't want which is the one you were looking for. When that item exists, it doesn't exist just for you so you don't have to gamble until you get what you want. You could just try a few times and go buy it from someone else if you don't get it while selling the items you got to others who are looking for them.
  6. I'd like to suggest giving a speed bonus to the character on foot, horse, cart/wagon and boat if the character has the entire server mapped within an atlas in the inventory. PvE only.
  7. +1 Love it Either a bsb or a furniture with many, many slots each of which can contain 100 gems. They don't ever decay anyways.
  8. The AI title requirement would be a temporary solution and based on how things are working out, they can decide whether to open a seperate subforum for it or not.
  9. They are starting to post more and more AI generated suggestions on the regular suggestions forum and as AI is becoming more popular, it is clearly going to become more frequent and not less. The few you are speaking of are becoming the majority of topics in the suggestions forum already, because of how easily spammable they are. You could also just change the name of the suggestions and ideas to AI generated suggestions and ideas at this rate, in order to avoid burdening the moderators with extra work. The moderators having to distinguish each AI topic and moving them to the AI generated subforums exists in a reality where nobody is posting where they are supposed to post in, and continue to repeatedly post at the wrong subforums. That is not the reality we live in right now, but I am sure it exists out there somewhere.
  10. You ''forgot'' to quote the 2nd part. Yeah, I do want AI generated suggestions to not be allowed on the forums but I also know they are going to be allowed so I wrote the following right under what you quoted. That's also the part that you've been responding to with your comments before you've decided that it is better to focus on the opening statement than the actual suggestion which might actually be found reasonable.
  11. That's the heavy part of my suggestion which is providing AI generated suggestions a seperate subforum but you have been openly against it, as well as the light part of my suggestion which is putting AI on the topic title to let people know it has been AI generated.
  12. This topic is about AI generated suggestions and I think your time is better spent opening topics or posting in topics regarding what you want to talk about which is trolling and spam in general, than trying to derail this topic.
  13. A very helpful part of that filtering could be putting AI on the title, if it is AI generated. I am yet to see an AI generated suggestion that is not a giant pile of garbage.
  14. If posters are required to write AI on the title, then we can at least seperate the trolls and frauds from the genuine AI users. You like using AI and think you are generating good suggestions with it? Wear that with pride by putting AI on your title. If you think people will only read your AI generated suggestion because they will assume it is not AI, then there is clearly a problem. There is a massive difference between correcting your text and having the AI write a whole page for you. I don't know if there is anyone who cares about you using AI for grammar correction, but I don't and I'd expect others to not also. If you think AI generating suggestions is a good thing, don't be ashamed by it. If you have faith in AI generated suggestions, then have faith in AI on the title attracting more attention, not less. If you put AI on your title, you also won't be flooded by comments in your topics about it being generated by AI. More and more AI generated suggestion topics popping out is going to result in more and more comments focused on how it is AI and the poster hasn't stated that anywhere. If the requirement doesn't happen preemptively, then it is going to naturally happen in a way that the poster will be incentivized to write AI in there to avoid comments focusing on it being AI or not instead of the suggestion's content. Even if someone would like their AI generated suggestion to appear to others as a natural suggestion, they will be better off putting AI in there so they'll end up doing it. I just don't know if it is necessary go through all of that when it can be solved now.
  15. You don't even tolerate AI on the title even tho it is an AI produced suggestion. Do people who read the suggestion not have a right to know? I think you are worried the AI spammers will make genuine AI users ignored by the community leading to their suggestions being ignored even if they contain valuable content. However, the reality is that the suggestions we have had so far that were written by AI have all been really bad and lazy suggestions. That means those need to be handled seperately. Sure, there needs to be something to prevent spammers who clearly troll without even trying to hide what and why they are doing it. We still need to know if the suggestion has been produced by AI or a human before reading the long suggestion (which how AI generated suggestions tend to be). If you are reading a long suggestion, often times you are doing it thinking there is a human behind this who put the time and mental effort into it, cared enough about it to write it so detailed. I don't want to give up on reading long and detailed suggestions just because there are a lot of AI generated long suggestions. So, I would like to know which ones are produced by AI on the title, before I have to look at or read anything. Is that really too much to ask?
  16. Someone could have 4 really good suggestions within 1 week while staying silent for a whole year. Should that person not be able to suggest those just because AI spammers exist? It is easy to forget an idea or lose the itch to post it on the forums after 1 week.
  17. Blazecraze I get that AI can be useful but it is not what has been happening so far. There's been another person who's been using AI and didn't seem like a troll (unlike Darnok) but the suggestions still looked like mindless mix and match spam. People just make it write massive wall of text for some quick basic idea they thought about for a split second and let AI dish it out. The last time I've checked, ChatGTP is not playing Wurm Online. Even if it is, it is not the one that is producing these questions. Are you agreeing with my suggestion or disagreeing with it? Do you think AI suggestions shouldn't be required to have AI on the title? Do you think AI suggestions shouldn't have their own subforum but continue to be posted on the suggestions subforum?
  18. You responding to me asking for the second time whether you use AI or not to generate these wall of texts after not responding to it the 1st time even tho you answered to it by quoting it, completely ignoring the AI part.
  19. An AI generated suggestions sub forum would be the woodscraps without the name. It is worse than woodscraps because woodscraps actually has something to offer. If people think AI generated suggestions are amazing and it is the new cool thing, they can then go spend time on that subforum. I don't want AI generated spam to overtake suggestions sub-forum.
  20. The problem is they can keep AI spamming for them while people who actually thought out every detail and write it all down themselves get their suggestions shoved behind the AI suggestion spam.