separate kick villager option as a deed role

[rosedragon 2282]

So we could assign people to be able to kick, but not able to screw up and taking over deed...

This allow MORE flexibility to the game and making the mayor job less every day for those who likes companion of many other players. This might increase the number of open settlements as mayor no longer need to be active everyday to handle possible runts.

Edited January 23, 2014 by rosedragon

[Bullbrand 63]

If you are the Mayor you can already revoke citizenship of a villager.

[silakka 2360]

If you are the Mayor you can already revoke citizenship of a villager.

 

The idea is to give that power to some other citizen that u trust, but you dont trust him enough to give all other permissions, just the kick.

[Busted 289]

+1

 

While most deeds are solo and alt affairs there are still enough large settlements that warrant an inclusion like this just so long as there are certain safeguards in place, like not being able to kick the mayor or those assigned by the mayor as "directors" and such.

[syncaidius 161]

+1. Anything that makes larger villages easier to manage is good IMO.

[FreeTineen 430]

+1. Anything that makes larger villages easier to manage is good IMO.

 

Exactly.

[Martynas5 441]

+1

[Elen 1013]

+1

[_Teal_ 478]

+1

[Nukkinak 36]

+1

[KanePT 698]

+1. Anything that makes larger villages easier to manage is good IMO.

+1