have missions give points to champions aswell

[RainRain 591]

i could see this being as another "relief" for champions so they dont have to worry about the current system being too much

i could see them giving about 2-3 pts depending on how hard they are?

[orthanas 7]

i could see this being as another "relief" for champions so they dont have to worry about the current system being too much

i could see them giving about 2-3 pts depending on how hard they are?

+1 except I'm not sure I agree with 2-3 pts, we'd have to see if thats too easy to maintain a champ with I guess.

[darthryan 588]

+1

[RainRain 591]

i could see this being as another "relief" for champions so they dont have to worry about the current system being too much

i could see them giving about 2-3 pts depending on how hard they are?

+1 except I'm not sure I agree with 2-3 pts, we'd have to see if thats too easy to maintain a champ with I guess.

i said 2-3 because thats what seems to be the average span for a mission, but i see your point

[RainRain 591]

So if the champ does the mission or part of it he gets points instead of sleep bonus?

i would say both, but thats fine too i guess

also i'd say there's a "base" points, i.e 3 per mission, and depending on how much % he does of the mission, he gets that much

i.e mission is kill 3 mobs or something, he kills 1 and i kill 2, he gets 1 point

[Mord 0]

I already suggested something like this in two other threads.  However, I +1 any idea for champs having to remain champs based on their participation in the missions.

[BrokenSanity 717]

+1 like the sound of this.

[rottenpie 45]

+1 champ should have to be the one who finishes the mission though

[orthanas 7]

+1 champ should have to be the one who finishes the mission though

idk... putting the last part onto an obelisk would be a little too easy.  Killing the last animal of a mission too etc.  It would have to be coded to include how much of the mission a champ did to be on more of a balanced side imo.

[Klaa 4,871]

Have some missions give more points than other mission types?

[RainRain 591]

Have some missions give more points than other mission types?

yeah another good idea

i.e missions in enemy home servers give more, and if it's like, preforming a ritual on a enemy tower, etc.

[RainRain 591]

no, i don't think you should put MORE pressure as it is to becoming a champ and maintaining it

you already lose a point daily anyways

[Mord 0]

If you focus champing/dechamping around  missions with no negative effects it evens out.  Do enough missions you champ.  Don't do them, you dechamp.

[RainRain 591]

no, i don't think you should put MORE pressure as it is to becoming a champ and maintaining it

you already lose a point daily anyways

One Question:  Why should it be easier to be a champion??

i'm actually with the high risk/reward system we had before, but right now it's pretty much nearly impossible to stay champ longer then 2 weeks

just not nearly as many deeds or people with high enough fs to fight (willing to, anyways)

it's just a pain, before we had the problem of champs idling and doing nothing, if we allow a alternative of doing missions it means they have another option other then constantly raiding deeds (if they can find enough to do so, without being some nearly unraidable deed)

[Mord 0]

However, if Rolf is able to fix missions as he says on the upcoming/to be done page... Then missions could actually be more pvp oriented (as they were intended?).

[qob 0]

-1. 

Champions are a deeply and fundamentally broken feature.

They are not worth Rolf's time to try (and fail) to  tweak them into balance.

Anything that lets a champ hang around longer than 15 days or so simply resuscitates what ought to be a corpse.

[Takerovered 0]

Maybe it should be only 1 person per god gets chosen for champion status and after one month it randomly switches to the next eligible player.