Posted April 12, 2010 Not sure if this has been suggested before but could a conirmaion be build in for remove friend? It's a nightmare at times to add a friend without being able to do this over a distance. (more on this in this thread http://wurmonline.com/forum/index.php?topic=30222.0) Removal however is instant and has no confirmation window or such. I have removed a friend of mine 3 times within a month because of this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 12, 2010 Not sure if this has been suggested before but could a conirmaion be build in for remove friend? It's a nightmare at times to add a friend without being able to do this over a distance. (more on this in this thread http://wurmonline.com/forum/index.php?topic=30222.0) Removal however is instant and has no confirmation window or such. I have removed a friend of mine 3 times within a month because of this. Take more care when you click on someone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 12, 2010 Not sure if this has been suggested before but could a conirmaion be build in for remove friend? It's a nightmare at times to add a friend without being able to do this over a distance. (more on this in this thread http://wurmonline.com/forum/index.php?topic=30222.0) Removal however is instant and has no confirmation window or such. I have removed a friend of mine 3 times within a month because of this. Take more care when you click on someone. Good idea, cause nobody besides me ever clicks on the wrong action for any object. I'm sorry but I fail to see that command helps at all Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 12, 2010 Not sure if this has been suggested before but could a conirmaion be build in for remove friend? It's a nightmare at times to add a friend without being able to do this over a distance. (more on this in this thread http://wurmonline.com/forum/index.php?topic=30222.0) Removal however is instant and has no confirmation window or such. I have removed a friend of mine 3 times within a month because of this. Take more care when you click on someone. Good idea, cause nobody besides me ever clicks on the wrong action for any object. I'm sorry but I fail to see that command helps at all Why are you casually clicking on another player regularly? I can't figure out why you might need to keep clicking on him so frequently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 12, 2010 Examine for one as this is needed when trying to bind wounds, trading is another. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 12, 2010 Not sure if this has been suggested before but could a conirmaion be build in for remove friend? It's a nightmare at times to add a friend without being able to do this over a distance. (more on this in this thread http://wurmonline.com/forum/index.php?topic=30222.0) Removal however is instant and has no confirmation window or such. I have removed a friend of mine 3 times within a month because of this. A good idea, ive had the same issue a few times before too, an "are you sure yes/no" confirmation box would be nice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 12, 2010 Good idea, cause nobody besides me ever clicks on the wrong action for any object. I'm sorry but I fail to see that command helps at allIt's not needed if you remove them with the typed command (because you deserve it if you can do that by accident ), and surely if you're close enough to click on the wrong action and thus remove them, you're close enough to add them again...? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 12, 2010 Good idea, cause nobody besides me ever clicks on the wrong action for any object. I'm sorry but I fail to see that command helps at allIt's not needed if you remove them with the typed command (because you deserve it if you can do that by accident ), and surely if you're close enough to click on the wrong action and thus remove them, you're close enough to add them again...? +1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 15, 2010 Good idea, cause nobody besides me ever clicks on the wrong action for any object. I'm sorry but I fail to see that command helps at allIt's not needed if you remove them with the typed command (because you deserve it if you can do that by accident ), and surely if you're close enough to click on the wrong action and thus remove them, you're close enough to add them again...? Yes I would be but, it requires both people to add the other again and confirming the add. The idea was to reduce 4 click to 1 click. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 15, 2010 Good idea, cause nobody besides me ever clicks on the wrong action for any object. I'm sorry but I fail to see that command helps at allIt's not needed if you remove them with the typed command (because you deserve it if you can do that by accident ), and surely if you're close enough to click on the wrong action and thus remove them, you're close enough to add them again...? Yes I would be but, it requires both people to add the other again and confirming the add. The idea was to reduce 4 click to 1 click. Oh dear! Is your finger getting tired? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 15, 2010 Yes I would be but, it requires both people to add the other again and confirming the add. The idea was to reduce 4 click to 1 click. Oh dear! Is your finger getting tired? You're surely not arguing that a more complicated process should be kept, because it's more complicated, despite that complication not adding anything to the game? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 15, 2010 Yes I would be but, it requires both people to add the other again and confirming the add. The idea was to reduce 4 click to 1 click. Oh dear! Is your finger getting tired? You're surely not arguing that a more complicated process should be kept, because it's more complicated, despite that complication not adding anything to the game? Who, me or him? I'm not really arguing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 15, 2010 You, and the word arguing in this case is not suggesting this is a fight, but a discussion with two opposing sides. You're arguing for or against a point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 15, 2010 You, and the word arguing in this case is not suggesting this is a fight, but a discussion with two opposing sides. You're arguing for or against a point. Yes I know. I'm not really doing it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted April 17, 2010 +1 The fact that he is close enough to "re"-friend is not relevant to the suggestion. Any "instant" actions should probably have a confirmation window. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites