Sign in to follow this  
Belfesar

Archaeology Contradictory Information

Recommended Posts

Information gained from Investigating contradicts itself.

 

[12:52:47] You can see multiple markers of abandoned settlements here. Based on your knowledge of the area and small hints you can find, one of the settlements must have been called Grindavik. You make a rough estimate that the settlement was inhabited for about 9 years, 2 months.

 

[12:53:29] You can see multiple markers of abandoned settlements here. Based on your knowledge of the area and small hints you can find, one of the settlements must have been called Grindavik. You make a rough estimate that the settlement was inhabited for about 8 years, 9 months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be a case of a deed disbanding and then founded again with the same name on the same spot.  

 

The message indicates 'multiple markers'.  If your search of the area doesn't come up with another deed name, that could be the reason.  Even though a deed has the same name, it's wurmID is not the same, so therefore its 'another' deed.

 

I'll leave this open in case others find similar issues or the former mayor or citizens can confirm my suspicion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this