ZarmaZarma

Members
  • Content Count

    3,930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by ZarmaZarma

  1. Auction has ended at 17s, with wsrich placing the winning bid. I'll PM you in a second.
  2. @wsrich Right, it's in the event that someone else bids in the next 6 minutes or so :)
  3. 10 minute snipe protection is in effect. Auction ends 10 minutes after the last bid.
  4. Starting bid: 15s Increments: 1s Sniper protection: 10 minutes Buyout: 25s Pickup is O9 on harmony. Delivery can be arranged (1 silver fee, will deliver for free if bought out). Auction is 24 hours long. Title says it all. I have an unfinished rare forge for sale. Upon completion, it becomes a fully functional rare forge. Rare forges heat items faster and take less fuel than a typical forge, and are highly desired among career smiths. Username on Northern Freedom is Zarmazarmanex.
  5. Auction ended with no bids. Please close!
  6. Starting bid: 15s Increments: 1s Sniper protection: 10 minutes Buyout: 25s Pickup is O9 on harmony. Delivery can be arranged (1 silver fee). Auction is 24 hours long. Title says it all. I have an unfinished rare forge for sale. Upon completion, it becomes a fully functional rare forge. Rare forges heat items faster and take less fuel than a typical forge, and are highly desired among career smiths. Username on Northern Freedom is Zarmazarmanex.
  7. That's odd... and here I was just pvping the other day. Wouldn't have guessed it was dead. Epic would be pretty interesting if all the failed-states and Chaos dropouts didn't go there and try to turn it into Wild Mark 2, sans grinding. This might be a little bit too old for some of our more recent, fledgling, spitfires to remember, but there was a time when Epic was supposed to be wiped every six months or so, skill reset and all. It wasn't until a certain lot carved out their niche and became too attached to the land that those ideas were scrapped. And now that they have their own little paradise, they're so scared to lose it. Why do you think 40 skill is like 70 on Epic? It was to make the grind less bad when everyone had to redo it every half-year. At any rate, if PVP is flourishing on Epic, I suppose you shouldn't be so concerned about consolidating it. And to strip freedomers of any chance they have of using their hard earned accounts to fight? Well, that just seems silly.
  8. Still not working. I get to "verifying application" and it closes. Happens for both stable and unstable clients.
  9. Thanks for the suggestion. I tried that, but unfortunately it did the same thing as before.
  10. Everytime I try to launch the client, both stable and unstable, it gets to "verifying applicaiton" and then closes without any further prompt. I don't get an error message, it doesn't crash- it just closes. I've tried reinstalling the client and java, but I haven't been able to fix it. Any ideas? Edit: Using 64 bit java, Version 7 Update 51.
  11. You shouldn't have been getting .25-.40 at that point. It's possible that you are referring to killing champion/greenish animals, which give much, much more experience than normal creatures. A spider at 55 should give you about .02, while a greenish one might give you .20, or more, depending on age. Before 70, killing an aged champion troll might give you .6 fight skill. At exactly 70, it will give you about .04.
  12. People PvP for fight skill? I always looked at is an incentive, but it seems counter intuitive that people would kill people to get fight skill so that they could better kill people. Isn't killing people the object, in the end? I pvp for affinities, loot, glory, etc. I don't like the idea of removing fs from killing people, because I enjoy the bonus reward, but to be honest... if it'll stop more guys from hitting 100 fs through complete BS, I'd prefer it. Unless we could come up with some better solutions....
  13. I have a feeling the whip is going to be used in cart creation or something, rather than as a weapon
  14. I would suggest turning on Pretty Trees and seeing what it does for your fps. I'm pretty sure the impact is minimal, and it will make your game look less like playdoh. Wurm has always been iffy with intel-integrated graphics cards.
  15. Hmm, it's been a while since a banlist was published. Curious that I only recognize a name or two amongst them- Marley, for one. Well, good job.
  16. It's this guys helmet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naoe_Kanetsugu The symbol atop his famous helmet reads "love".
  17. Chaos Decision

    Servers up, justice served, learned a bit more about some people I'd rather not associate with. Pretty standard Wurm Crisis. The dissemination of information and attempted subversion for personal gain was pretty nasty, but it's behind us now. I would like to thank the GM team for making a very rational decision, and I hope this sort of things never needs to happen again.
  18. Very little lag between early Wednesday morning and the DDoS attack. inb4 graphs are unreliable.
  19. I also tried to lead a horse while I was skedaddling, and I think Nad might have tried to pick up a hota statue, if it helps your case. Rofl.
  20. I'm asking because you literally just said "It isn't fair to the other residents on the server who were unaffected by this raid to be further penalised by downtime because of it", and then suggested the one course of action that would penalize all the uninvolved parties.
  21. Some defenders during the lag wasnt able to got to deed and defend, I personaly spend a half a hour trying got my horse back lol The server wasn't lagging during the raid, so I'm afraid you must be lying. I would request that you did not try to manipulate information to skew the results of what was an entirely fair pvp event. When the lag began both sides were forced to stop. JK was in no way inhibited in defending the deed prior to that, and the condition of the server entirely stable until the lag began. Many of the would-be-defenders seem to be making the claim that the lag somehow prevented you from defending the deed, but such claims are entirely fictitious. How could the lag affect one side more than the other? Please stop fabricating events to change the game in your favor.
  22. Wouldn't A affect everyone on the server, especially those who were not present?
  23. My opinion is that A is entirely uncalled for, and that D will result in complete carnage. People will log on en masse, as quickly and as many as they can, and the stragglers will likely be left to die. Either of those options seems unacceptable because they completely violate the concept of fair play. Nonetheless, I would rather take D than A, with B and C being the fairest options. I hope the GM team comes up with a similar solution, or at least something that is fair to both sides.