Tedzogh

Members
  • Content Count

    302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tedzogh


  1. On 11/24/2023 at 6:07 PM, Army said:

    Instead, we are currently planning a general (non-merge) solution for character transfers between clusters, including PvE and PvP.

    What the acual F is this?
     

    You say you dont want bandaids. The sugestion we had was a wanted permanent solution instead you come up with this crap...


  2. 12 hours ago, Omar said:

    Another missed customer

    [12:58:50] <Xanthor> Does anyone play this?
    [12:59:29] <Zzzomar> what server u on?
    [12:59:59] <Xanthor> desertion
    [13:00:21] <Zzzomar> that cluster is dead bro
    [13:00:26] <Zzzomar> type  /who
    [13:00:28] <Xanthor> oh .
    [13:00:39] <Xanthor> lmao
    [13:00:54] <Xanthor> can i transfer?
    [13:01:38] <Xanthor> okay. how many are where you are?

     

    Imagine if there was a away to start on any freedom server and let's say for example have a portal leading to the only pvp server where all the pvp comunity is gatherd. Wild idea i know.


  3. Well spoken @Guvna!

     

    This will need to happen soon!

    It is a win win with no backsides of the coin.

    pve wont be affected at all. (those of you who think that need to go back and read the suggestion again)

    I think i havnt seen a single pvp player downvoting it.

    What are you guys waiting for? players to give up compleatly in the game and never come back?

    Becaus that is surly what is going to happen if you dont act quickly.

     


  4. 1 minute ago, Miket said:

    Even if it's public you don't have to respond to it. All you do is stir more drama for no reason.

     

    Don't listen to him, keep going need this for my popcorn ;)


  5. 10 minutes ago, Pukaria said:

    Just remove Chaos and Epic 🙃 and let SFI PvPers portal to Defiance for PvP. Consolidate the player base and stop the dev team from being pulled in multiple directions trying to balance multiple different servers.

     

    I Acualy said the exact same thing in our discord earlier today.

     

    Edit: Also awsome uppdate ❤️


  6. 3 minutes ago, Sn00 said:

     

    Are you saying Enki spawned permanent towers for you? I really does hope that's not the case.

     

    Not permanen, but untill the capital bug was fixed, still don't change the fact that he deamed it a legit swap of the deed.


  7. 6 minutes ago, Xallo said:

     

    Could we get some explanation on when it was decided that this was a bug? To my knowledge this has been used extensively in the past, and it was assumed to be an intended feature by many.

     

    In the instances prior to Prawn's removal of two deeds on Chaos the other day, it has never been rectified.

     

    I'm happy this is finally being classified as a bug, but it's quite a few years late.

     

    I am with you in it should have been classified as a bug, but we could attleast have been given a warning that we shouldn't do it before they disband deeds and ban players.


  8. 2 minutes ago, Cecci said:

     

    Even I who never played pvp knew since like forever that expaning territory on pvp is done by towerchaining. It is expanding, not creating islands of territory.

     

    Thing is, there is allready a mechanic in the game that makes unlionked deeds take 3x more bash damage, no guard spawns, so unless there is a certain reason to acualy have a unlinked deed you generaly don't wanna do that anyway when there is penaltys in the game for that. 
    So it have been upp to the kingdoms themselfs to deside if the want that penalty or not in the past.

    As i said, it have been done so many times allready, and just now they decides to swap the rules about it.


  9. How is it a nobrainer?

    It have been in the game forever!

    Last time we fliped a deed that way we even had ENki himself there helping with dropping towers in between becaus it didn't work to set the new deed as capital.

    So if the HEAD GAMEMASTER found it legit, how come it isn't now?


  10. How about setting perms on the minedoor instead to let your kingdom go through it?

    That have been used several times, is it any different? if not i have some pandas to report.

     

    And if the minedoor is on perimiter and a enemy still have manage rights to get in to the deed that way, is that ok?

    Have some more players to report if so.

     

     

     


  11. This change could dramatikly increas the fun on Chaos, bu having more incentive of roaming and hunting on Chaos instead of ppl going to freedom to hunt.

    Every change thet makes it more worth of acualy by off deed is a change in the right direction, i can not see anything that would speak against it.