90068

Members
  • Content Count

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 90068


  1. Members of alliance are unable to rotate Food and Bulk Storage Bins on an allied deed. They are able to push and pull them, and are able to turn other objects (forges, crates, beds, etc) without issue. Village members can turn BSBs and FSBs, it is only alliance members who cannot


  2. As it stands now there is a rule in place governing JKH and MRH that doesn't extend to BLH.

    The only rule I know of that fits this description is the one that disallows you from using alts in one kingdom to assist an enemy kingdom. This is disallowed on MRH and JKH but not on BLH.

    Nothing directly involving multiple kingdoms was done on these alts that I'm aware of.

    Because when you do it on WL servers you are abusing the reputation system

    Most of the killing was pointless.  All that had to be done was attack the ones building walls to stop them and replace their plans with curbs so they couldn't build anymore.  If anyone was at risk of being converted, it was because they were bloodthirsty.  Maybe HOTS is where they belong.

  3. So isn't that worth discussing?

     

    I was told by a number of people that the recent griefing on Serenity was specifically to force the Devs/GMs to pay attention. Npw they are that's wrong too?

     

    Jeez.

     

    Whatever.

    I didn't say they were wrong, and I didn't say it wasn't worth discussing. I was telling you what you've apparently already heard.  The fact it had to be done to JKH before it got some real attention just shows how much the Devs/GMs favor JK over HOTS, and that most likely extends into parts of the game other than grief alts.


  4. That said - IF BL players have "fairness" issues in game that they feel can only be addressed in negative ways - isn't that at least worth a conversation?

    I'm also going to assume you're talking about the alts.  Griefing's been happening on Affliction and BLE for months and months, or longer.  Any time it was reported, the reply was usually "it's not against the rules," even from Enki -- and it wasn't against the rules.  The game rules for Epic regarding griefing only says "no defamation of character".

    Now it happens on Serenity, and within hours we get GMs directly intervening despite the "we want players to handle it themselves" attitude they've always had, and within days there's this:

    <Enki> We are investigating the problems affecting the Epic servers concerning non main kingdom avatars being used to cause harm. This falls under the Disruptive Player act and will be dealt with.

     

    This right here is evidence of a fairness issue, and it looks like favoritism.