Yamuliss

Members
  • Content Count

    539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Yamuliss

  1. Selling Silver Coin, Pay Pal Verified Only in 1 gold chunks currently have 1 Gold and am selling it at the bargain price of 100 US Dollars. It's sure to go fast. First come first serve.
  2. F: Rare Hatchet 6 s /ingame toon to mail to Angar B: Rare Hammer 5 s /ingame toon to mail to Angar
  3. it could be considered that way "yes" doesn't make it right and most are not like that. Select few are.
  4. Well it doesn't do any good to agree with you or disagree as long as you keep calling it entitlement mentality so this is my final thought on it. You had some who whined and wanted the rules changed to stop greed and land grabbing. 1000 tiles of fencing for some with a tiny shack popping up all over became really insane after a while especially when it was combined with attempts to grief others. This was being done all over the place. I see both sides to it. Your correct it did hurt new players by the change in the rules limiting protection for the new players and mainly free to play players. But when you get down to it nothing in life is ever really free. Free to play is like an intro into the game for one to decide if they like or dislike the game with the encouragement to purchase premium time to continue to play the game and enjoy the "entitlements" as you would say. We are in the same book Proximo but on a different page is all. I detest change myself but only if it's truly damaging. The rules regarding fences and enclosures should not have seen a fast rapid change. They should have substituted for some sort trial deed for newer players to see if they like the game at which point they could premium and pay to continue. They sort of did that with the Tent idea and stakes. You will not get me to agree that massive free land grabbing was over all good for the game. That i will disagree on.
  5. Im not really disagreeing with Proximo but he saying it was a entitlement mentality correct me im wrong how he worded that. Im saying it was those that whined and advocated for rule change that created the scenario that is being experienced over all not a entitlement mentality. Two posts up i said change is not always a good thing.
  6. This is a sand box and last i check it has or rather had an ingame economy based on trade mechanics and real currency so it has both aspects. It's not a entitlement to say deed it or lose it. It's the opposite saying hey you want something you better plan on paying for it. An entitlement would be to suggest your owed something thus your entitled to it. Example- Im a new player i feel im entitled to 12x12 deed for free because im new. Your use of entitlement doesn't do your argument justice. Simple to say you was against rule change and those that felt rule change was in order gave rise to this issue that is now a problem. But it wasn't an issue of entitlement how you have explained it. You could argue and say at the home page under terms of service it clearly states that you own nothing in the game and club code reserves all rights which makes the argument that just because you pay for it doesn't mean you own anything because in truth according to how that reads, you own nothing! TOS Creation of this account allows you the exclusive use of this account for playing the Wurm Online game by accessing the service provided by Code Club AB pursuant to the terms and conditions in this agreement. You acknowledge and agree that you shall have no ownership or other property interest in the Account and that the account is under the sole ownership of Code Club AB. But i do agree its an old argument one i don't really want to revisit with you and others.
  7. The enclosure rule was good and bad. The Bad- To many greedy people thought that huge land grabs for free was ideal to a good game play experience leaving less for new arrivals. I seen it my self on release, celebration, deli and else where. The enclosure rule had to end so that the new and great server Xanadu wouldn't fall prey to greedy land grabbers. It became almost like an exploit. Much the same way that traders was used. Btw i seen a thread as of recent where Xanadu was calling for traders to be used on the server. It was some those same players that called an end to traders now they want them back and on Xanadu seeing how hundreds play on xanadu. It's greed! All or nothing is how i see it. The grand experiment Xanadu failed! It didn't get what they hoped for in the way of new players. It has had and continues to have many issues. So you claim many threw those like you under the bus about the enclosure rule but my question for you is how many rule changes have you supported that many did not agree with. It goes both ways. The Good- It kept griefing to a minimum on the freedom servers. People thought long and hard before bashing fences. Sometimes change is not good. I wasn't for or against the enclosure rule being removed just like i wasn't for a huge change involving traders but i do feel that if you want something you should pay for it and if you want in game currency you should earn it or pay for it not exploit it or think your entitled to it. Most games require you to pay for everything almost. I for one am thankful the game not like most games.
  8. Perhaps i wasn't trying to be precise on how it took place with all the fine details. Never the less my point was made on how alliances can be exploited to inflict harm and trap players. No matter how it happen you still had an idiot who took it upon himself to grief another player by killing that players live stock off and for no other good reason then to grief the player. The fact is he was both a PVE and PVP player. The fact is he/she was a player who played long enough that he/she should have known better. The fact is he/she had friends and laughed with those friends as they was doing the griefing, It was premeditated and planned. These are the kinds of players that should be banned from playing this game. Going around to cause trouble and destroy other game players game experience should not be acceptable behavior. Those that i outlined are the facts as presented to me.` You have some sort of facts outside of what i was told feel free to PM me. I was giving examples of grief if you read my post clearly and it was even labeled as examples, I was not presenting facts to the issue to advocate for another player maybe because i felt the community did a good enough job condemning the pathetic player who conducted the griefing.
  9. Newbie Rope?

    My concern about giving the new player a rope is theft of horses by accident! Enough griefing is going on already then to give misguided judgement to a new player to fall trap into. I guess it's cool if that little bit about horse thieving is mentioned in the tutorial as it's deemed wrong if it's still considered wrong. Im out of the loop a little on this subject matter. I know we no longer have a rule policy to ask if a ship belongs to anyone before conducting salvage rights. Has posting lost horses changed as well? I thought if you find a horse you should list it before taking and assuming it's yours but maybe that's changed. I know spawned horses don't matter but how a new player to tell the difference one way or another? As someone else mentioned why it matter when a new player can't ride a horse unless (A) he has the skill set to do so. (B ) Is premium to ride a horse ?
  10. I call on the GMs to revamp the rules to end the following listed and to enforce heavy punishment and return the game back to the way it was in previous years where griefing of any sort was not tolerated in order to establish a more friendly environment for new player base of people. #1 End the Name and Shame rule disallowing players to run wild with name and shame of individuals and witch hunts. GMs are the ones who should sort out complaints and resolve ingame disputes, not the community or the player base. Issues as of late have run rapid with ingame witch hunts and false accusations. It's Time to end this kind of behavior once and for all! #2 End cross server griefing from Chaos- Deli and any other server. It should not be ok for players to cross servers to slaughter animals, cut trees down or terraform into other deeded players perimeters for the sole purpose to grief others, should be a rule to stop this kind of behavior. There a place for PVP game play and the PVE servers are not it! I propose to change the way the Perimeter works for deeds. A perimeter shouldn't be able to be altered by anyone except the owner of the deed. Consider it a neutral zone where nothing but rapid decay takes place. If you want the tiles you should deed the tiles plain and simple. Acts of griefing should be taken more serious and harsher penalties should be conducted. There is a reason why players like to play on PVE server vs PVP. They want there stuff safe and they want what they work on left alone! Same with trying to look for loop holes to grief. Such as exploiting Kos features or Alliance features for the sole purpose to grief a player. "Example" ( oh yes you may join our alliance and btw set your deed up right next to our alliance- Bam next day the player on Kos ) Or another example (Yeah you can join our alliance, Next day all the horses of a given alliance member deed ends up slaughtered by a griefing idiot that joined the alliance to do one thing and that's grief!) These issues sound familiar well that's because they actually took place! No names mentioned! It should never have taken place but it did! While i touch on the idea of changing how perimeters work id also suggest giving mayors of deeds the right to move vehicles of any kind off the deed to the edge of the perimeter regardless if the vehicle locked or not and regardless who owns it. This would end support calls to GMs to deal with this kind of grief. #3 Personal in-game attacks of players in-game on the GL Freedom and Freedom should not be tolerated. It's a place to communicate for trade and friendship not to bash one another. They want to insult, troll, slander and act like children it should be kept in a PM format. Call it censorship to keep the game at a peaceful state of calmness. Give and restore Authority to Chat Mods to heavily regulate the GL Freedom, Freedom and Forum postings to stop this ongoing rude and unethical game behavior. Some of us are here to play the game and have fun. The Slander, The Witch Hunts, The Name and Shame and the out right bullying of players and ingame griefing needs to end! very few rules to this apply on the PVP servers those that want to act in this manner should play on those servers pvp servers where it's deemed acceptable to raid, pillage and persist in drama. PVE should remain a hostile free environment solely on the purpose of keeping newer players safe from abuse within the game.
  11. I was considering taking the game to Game Cons in my local area to spread the word and for recruitment to the game. Has that changed? Well it depends on how we "The Community"shape and mold the community over all in our treatment of new players. I am still drowning in bitter waters as of recent events although i do see the way to the life boat. But i would say Game Cons would be ideal. Problem with Wurm is it's not advertised like other major MMOs. But word of mouth is still a good source of advertisement and the best because it's at a personal level of experience.
  12. No one cares! People have the attitude in this game that anyone can do anything to anyone at any time. Doesn't pay to be nice. Doesn't help to do whats right. One the reasons why im leaving the game. Game not what it once was. The bad people control the community and the game as a whole from my perspective. The rules will never be fixed to serve new players and end griefing as a whole.
  13. Want to sell 100 silver coin. Be pay pal verified. 1 euro per 1 s looking to sell it all as a lump sum not partial.
  14. Mods please close the post the community has judged and is tired of the drama! I support the closing of the thread!
  15. thats, hmmm gee i hope not. lmao waar your too much
  16. nah nah you was being sarcastic don't try and twist your words around again you got caught now your trying to better yourself before the community like the fool you acted like stop being a troll. You got called out now you don't like it. Why don't you read and further more be more careful in your accusations my friend in the future. You don't have to be concerned what accounts i have i wouldn't do business with you in this game with you if you offered me the stuff free. Here your comment go back re-read yourself "PM from Lorraine thanking me for my support against it" - yes i believe you, and you reinstalled windows i guess after that, so no pms left.
  17. Members 877 posts Sent 06 July 2015 - 03:33 PM Yes someone told me he was. It's not their fault though, how could they control him? But now at least they know what he did. And maybe in general there can be a discussion about how it's not ok to go prey on players that have no way of defending themselves. Thanks for writing, it helps a lot. Lorraine Hang 'em high... So bangzuvelis you call me out as a liar on that huh? Show me where i have said point blank other then a poor business deal doesnt make him a thief, Point out where i said that he wasn't a thief. Your very toxic to the community with your twisting of words and lies. Ill waste no more time with you Troll. Your off topic you focus the issue on me like a troll thus makes you a troll.
  18. i have 16 accounts so best of luck bud
  19. Nah keep it open! Shows the immaturity of some!
  20. I comment on threads just like you do. I am able to say what i please just like you do. Sorry if you don't like it. i don't threaten what i say ill do! So there you go. I was against the slaughter of the horses for your information and i ousted Sir law and condemned him for it even got a PM from Lorraine thanking me for my support against it. So don't twist facts buddy. As for the other. I never said he wasn't a thief i said the same thing im saying now people jumped to conclusions to fast. So you go with your bad self in twisting facts! By the way who continuing to bring this topic up again. people just like you with personal attacks. Whats your relationship to the parties involved im curious perhaps a good friend to Susie?