Jump to content


Photo

The Great Fence Of China

fence fences decay

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
58 replies to this topic

#1 kraten

kraten

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:03 AM

I LOVE to wander the lands of Wurm but much of the time is spent navigating the maze of various fences. I'm suggesting increasing the decay of off-deed fences for several reasons:

Fences are very easy for anyone to construct and even low QL fences last a terribly long time making them abundant.

Fences are very important to the starting player who needs early protection and security but their areas tend to be small at first. Ever evolving, a new player's area should be able to grow and take shape to their needs, including rearranging fence layout. Fences should be easier to deal with and remove by the person who constructed it. While destroying a wall by hand is near impossible, a catapult really isn't an option either for a new player due to the rope needed to construct; this makes moving and leaving an area to decay about your only option; leading to many small wasted areas with fences still standing.

I have noticed owners of small deeds fencing off HUGE tracts of land well beyond deed borders with little concern due to the slow decay rate of fences. While i'm not disagreeing with the practice, there should still be balance between gaining large areas of private land and being responsible for maintaining that much fence.

Another matter relating to claiming such large areas without balance is allowing hedges to grow on such steep slopes. This in effect negates the restrictions otherwise given to normal fence slopes. Have a slope that's too steep? Just throw a hedge down and keep going.

In areas around me specifically, I have noticed people resorting to hugely long fences (The Great Fence of China) spanning hundreds of borders to block off entire regions to travel for no real reason. Increasing off-deed decay should at least help in the matter of fence abuse and make exploration more enjoyable for everyone.

In short, fences should not be as abundant as they are and maintaining fences should be more important if off-deed.

Edited by kraten, 03 December 2012 - 08:10 AM.


#2 Cita

Cita

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 78 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:51 AM

Unless there's a gatehouse every 11 tiles it's not an enclosure and you can bash right through it, and i totally agree :) +1

#3 Wulfgar

Wulfgar

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,065 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 06:04 PM

Yes, since fences don't have ownership like houses so decay can't increase after the owner haven't logged in for a while it would only be logical to increase the decay on off-deed fences.
ql70 fences can last for 1 year+ off-deed which is too much, it wouldn't be too much to require people to at least maintain their off-deed enclosures once a month IMHO.

Alternatively could also add ownership to fences, that would also enable new players to bash their own fences they misplaced without getting to 21 body strength.
I am no longer associated with the in-game account of Wulfgar.

#4 Protunia

Protunia

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 6,651 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 06:08 PM

Well If I remember correctly roads tiles used to have to be used or they would go away.

Why not make it so if no one walked near the tile the fence was on after awhile they would speed up decay.

GET TO WORK!!


#5 Alyeska

Alyeska

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5,255 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 06:39 PM

I went back to independance, well over a year (probably much longer) after I left. The fences to my old deed were still here. 40 ish ql iron fences with only 60 damage on them after a year of no maintanance is just silly.


big +1 from me for faster decay on off-deed fences

Ukkosenjumalan Tytär


#6 KellyTxX

KellyTxX

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,102 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 06:45 PM

+1
KellyT is a pirate!

#7 Sir Arowhun

Sir Arowhun

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,100 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 06:50 PM

Well If I remember correctly roads tiles used to have to be used or they would go away.


Roads still work this way. If a road isn't used for a month it has a 1 out of 10 chance of disappearing

I went back to independance, well over a year (probably much longer) after I left. The fences to my old deed were still here. 40 ish ql iron fences with only 60 damage on them after a year of no maintanance is just silly.


big +1 from me for faster decay on off-deed fences


Thats too long for them to be around. I agree 100% +1

They should be gone in a month or two without maintenance.

#8 Wulfgar

Wulfgar

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 3,065 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 07:12 PM

Another matter relating to claiming such large areas without balance is allowing hedges to grow on such steep slopes. This in effect negates the restrictions otherwise given to normal fence slopes. Have a slope that's too steep? Just throw a hedge down and keep going.


Just noticed this.
A hedge isn't a fence so its not an enclosure if part of the enclosure uses hedges (an enclosure as defined in the FCC).

I still feel enclosures (as defined by FCC) should have a size limit to be protected, because I notice more and more 50x50+ enclosures recently. Thats a whole other discussion though.
I am no longer associated with the in-game account of Wulfgar.

#9 Sir Arowhun

Sir Arowhun

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,100 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 07:22 PM

hedges should decay somehow.

#10 Macgregor

Macgregor

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 289 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:21 PM

-1

Edited by Macgregor, 05 December 2012 - 01:59 AM.

Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

#11 Alyeska

Alyeska

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5,255 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 08:31 PM

Just because you want to wander the map doesn't mean you should be able to remove the only means of keeping someone's land safe from mass tree cutters, pit diggers and other such riff raff.



Deed it or lose it

Ukkosenjumalan Tytär


#12 Macgregor

Macgregor

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 289 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:07 AM

Deed it or lose it


Right

Edited by Macgregor, 05 December 2012 - 01:59 AM.

Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

#13 Jonneh

Jonneh

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 425 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:55 AM

I think it would be nice if unmaintained fences/walls decayed much quicker than they do, but only if it's easier to keep them maintained (maybe by removing the need for a plank/brick/whatever if the damage is under 10 or 5 or something). This would reduce the clutter from abandoned villages and at the same time make it slightly easier for active players to keep their area maintained.

Edited by Jonneh, 07 December 2012 - 04:01 PM.

0x474A2198B2781B9D


#14 Pingpong

Pingpong

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1,175 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:58 AM

I think it would be nice if unmaintained fences/walls decayed much quicker than they do, but only if it's easier to keep them maintained (maybe by removing the need for a plank/brick/whatever if the damage is under 10 or 5 or something. This would reduce the clutter from abandoned villages and at the same time make it slightly easier for active players to keep their area maintained.


So, something like easier maintenance and faster decay? Brilliant!

#15 Shrimpiie

Shrimpiie

    Villager

  • Board Moderator
  • 5,595 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 03:13 AM

Now I sound like Protunia but I completely disagree with off deed fence decay increase. I'm fine with how it is, I do have some fences off deed surrounding small parts of land that are a pain to maintinence in general, so more decay would really not help. And if that isn't enough to go against the idea then what about new players that can't afford a deed? They usually live on shacks with a small fenced in area for a few months or more, increased decay rate really wouldn't be fair to them.
So a -1

BM/CA: Shrimpiie


#16 Sir Arowhun

Sir Arowhun

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 2,100 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 04:47 AM

I think decay should be slow at first, but after it hits a certain dmg it should be gone in a few days.

#17 Alyeska

Alyeska

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5,255 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 04:55 AM

Know what. You are absolutely right. These enclosures the noobs make need to decay much much faster. My 70ql fences will last. I pay for my perimiter and I'm able to protect it. Their 20ql fences won't last with faster decay. They don't need enclosures anyway. So screw the noobs so a couple people can wander around.


Your perimeter doesnt protect your fences against decay, so you will still ahve to manually repair everything you build ofdeed - perimeter or not. The noobs dont get screwed. They dont try to maintain 200x200 enclosures ofdeed, just a small fenced area. A couple of planks every month isnt much, but you will force the landwhoring vets around the servers to put effort into keeping "their" free ###### protected.

Ukkosenjumalan Tytär


#18 Shrimpiie

Shrimpiie

    Villager

  • Board Moderator
  • 5,595 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 04:56 AM

Bad idea, when there is a player not on a for a bit and the walls are a damaged and close to that point, then they are gone unexpectedly, they come back and a good portion of their walls are down, that isn't fair. And if you don't like the fences and walls being up then get out a maul and start bashing some down :/

BM/CA: Shrimpiie


#19 kraten

kraten

    Villager

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 05:49 AM

Bad idea, when there is a player not on a for a bit and the walls are a damaged and close to that point, then they are gone unexpectedly, they come back and a good portion of their walls are down, that isn't fair. And if you don't like the fences and walls being up then get out a maul and start bashing some down :/


I disagree with that totally, fences show a different graphic for high Dmg. at 60+ which is more than generous, giving you plenty of notice that they need repair.

The point was also made about how incredibly hard it is to bash a fence with a maul. I once spent 20 minutes on one section that I built to destroy it(not having wemp yet), that just shows something is wrong with that system.

You also stated earlier:
They usually live on shacks with a small fenced in area for a few months or more, increased decay rate really wouldn't be fair to them.
I agree new players live in small shacks at first but I would argue they lack the experience to construct a viable settlement that would still suit them a month later. They need the ability to expand, improve and re-arrange fences. Higher decay would not hurt them as much as not being able to take down their own badly positioned fences.

#20 Shrimpiie

Shrimpiie

    Villager

  • Board Moderator
  • 5,595 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 06:25 AM

Hmmm, actually you make some very valid points, may have to rethink on that one. But still I do have walls off deed and they are a hassle to repair to begin with, a higher decay rate would make it a nightmare

BM/CA: Shrimpiie